Diet barriers in type 2 diabetic patients and their coping strategies

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

Background: Factors hindering effective nutritional therapy (diet barriers, DB) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2), their coping strategies and association with biomedical and psychosocial characteristics of the Russian patients have not been studied.

Aim: To identify the role and clinical correlates of DB and diet coping in various categories of patients with DM2.

Materials and methods: This cross-sectional cohort study included 297 consecutively recruited out- and in-patients with DM2 (mean age 61±10.1 years, diabetes duration 1 to 35 years). All patients had standard clinical and laboratory assessments and filled in questionnaires on DB, diet coping, level of knowledge on DM, state/trait anxiety scale, depression scale (modified Zung), Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction questionnaire (DTSQ), Audit of Diabetes-dependent Quality of Life questionnaire (Ru-ADDoQL). Mann-Whitney, chi-square and Fischer's exact test were used for group comparisons. Final analysis was based on multiple and logistic regression models.

Results: Mean (±SD) number of DB per patient was 8.4±4.9 and similar in insulin-treated and non-insulin-treated patients. The most prevalent were DB related to poor physical well-being (51% of the patients), additional financial burden (54%) and decreased food variety (41%). The highest weighted prevalence was identified for 6 DB, such as “difficulties to adhere to the diet in unexpected situations” (1.8 scores), “having to spend a lot for the diet” (1.4), “if I eat not regularly, I feel unwell”, “I cannot eat tasty foods and enjoy them” (1.3  each), “when I  eat more than I  am allowed, I feel unwell”, “I would like to eat what it is not allowed for me” (1.2 each), and “it is difficult to fully abstain from sweets” (1.1). Number of DB per patient increased significantly with age and decreased with higher educational level and social status. There were differences in types of DB between male and female patients, between those currently employed and non-employed, and between highly compliant and non-compliant to their diabetes regimen. There was an inverse correlation between DB numbers and total dietary adherence score, diabetes-dependent quality of life score, subjective assessment of personal health status and a direct correlation between DB number and trait anxiety. No impact of past participation in a diabetes education program or of the level of knowledge on diabetes on DB number was found. For most DB the patients demonstrated the socalled compliant coping (i.e., adherence to the diet recommendations), excluding the DB “I am not allowed to eat when I am hungry”, which was associated mostly with intermediate coping styles that might unfavorably influence one's health status. The compliant diet coping scores were in a weak negative correlation with DB number and with the patient's level of knowledge on diabetes. DTSQ score weakly but significantly correlated with the total score of compliant and intermediate diet coping.

Conclusion: Main DB in DM2 are related to physical discomfort, financial problems and limitations in food choices. Individual DB content depends on age, gender, educational level, social status and employment. Higher numbers of DB per patient is associated with decreased possibility of compliant diet coping style. Overloaded diet recommendations are associated with an increase in DB number that may lead to poorer patient compliance to diabetes treatment in general, as well as to poorer diabetes-dependent quality of life. Elderly patients, as well as those with lower educational level, unemployed, with uncontrolled diabetes, poor general compliance and higher levels of anxiety and depression have the highest DB numbers. Individual DB are to be considered during therapeutic patient education in DM2 and patient-tailored approach to therapy. 

About the authors

E. G. Starostina

Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute (MONIKI)

Author for correspondence.
Email: elena.starostina@rambler.ru

Elena G. Starostina – MD, PhD, Professor, Chair of Endocrinology, Postgraduate Training Faculty,

61/2 Shchepkina ul., Moscow, 129110

+7 (495) 631 73 79

Russian Federation

References

  1. Дедов ИИ, Шестакова МВ, Майоров АЮ, ред. Алгоритмы специализированной медицинской помощи больным сахарным диабетом. 8-й вып. Сахарный диабет. 2017;20(1S):1–112. doi: 10.14341/DM20171S8.
  2. American Diabetes Association. 4. Lifestyle Management: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(Suppl 1):S38–S50. doi: 10.2337/dc18-S004.
  3. Старостина ЕГ. Структура питания и ассоциированные с ней факторы у больных сахарным диабетом 2-го типа. Альманах клинической медицины. 2018;46(3):240–53. doi: 10.18786/2072-0505-2018-46-3-240-253.
  4. Glasgow RE, Hampson SE, Strycker LA, Ruggiero L. Personal-model beliefs and social-environmental barriers related to diabetes self-management. Diabetes Care. 1997;20(4): 556–61. doi: 10.2337/diacare.20.4.556.
  5. Старостина ЕГ. Психологические аспекты диетотерапии при сахарном диабете 2 типа. Ожирение и метаболизм. 2008;2(15):7–10. doi: 10.14341/omet200827-10.
  6. Cheng L, Leung DY, Sit JW, Li XM, Wu YN, Yang MY, Gao CX, Hui R. Factors associated with diet barriers in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016;10:37–44. doi: 10.2147/PPA. S94275.
  7. Foley E, BeLue R. Identifying barriers and enablers in the dietary management of type 2 diabetes in M'Bour, Senegal. J Transcult Nurs. 2017;28(4):348–52. doi: 10.1177/1043659616649028.
  8. Halali F, Mahdavi R, Mobasseri M, Asghari Jafarabadi M, Karimi Avval S. Perceived barriers to recommended dietary adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes in Iran. Eat Behav. 2016;21:205–10. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2016.03.001.
  9. Laranjo L, Neves AL, Costa A, Ribeiro RT, Couto L, Sá AB. Facilitators, barriers and expectations in the self-management of type 2 diabetes – a qualitative study from Portugal. Eur J Gen Pract. 2015;21(2):103–10. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2014.1000855.
  10. Mora N, Golden SH. Understanding cultural influences on dietary habits in Asian, Middle Eastern, and Latino patients with type 2 diabetes: A review of current literature and future directions. Curr Diab Rep. 2017;17(12):126. doi: 10.1007/s11892-017-0952-6.
  11. Sohal T, Sohal P, King-Shier KM, Khan NA. Barriers and facilitators for type-2 diabetes management in South Asians: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0136202. doi: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0136202.
  12. Booth AO, Lowis C, Dean M, Hunter SJ, McKinley MC. Diet and physical activity in the self-management of type 2 diabetes: barriers and facilitators identified by patients and health professionals. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2013;14(3):293–306. doi: 10.1017/S1463423612000412.
  13. Shultz JA, Sprague MA, Branen LJ, Lambeth S. A comparison of views of individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus and diabetes educators about barriers to diet and exercise. J Health Commun. 2001;6(2):99–115. doi: 10.1080/10810730116985.
  14. Бурлачук ЛФ. Словарь-справочник по психодиагностике. 3-е изд. СПб.: Питер; 2008. 688 с.
  15. Bradley C. The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire: DTSQ. In: Bradley C, editor. Handbook of Psychology and Diabetes: a guide to psychological measurement in diabetes research and practice. 3rd edition. Harwood Academic Publishers; 2001. P. 111–32.
  16. Bradley C, Todd C, Gorton T, Symonds E, Martin A, Plowright R. The development of an individualized questionnaire measure of perceived impact of diabetes on quality of life: the ADDQoL. Qual Life Res. 1999;8(1–2):79–91. doi: 10.1023/A:1026485130100.
  17. Старостина ЕГ. Биомедицинские и психосоциальные аспекты сахарного диабета и ожирения: взаимодействие врача и пациента и пути его оптимизации: автореф. дис. … д-ра мед. наук. М.; 2003. 40 с.
  18. Friele RD. Diabetes and diet: managing dietary barriers. Thesis. Wageningen, Nederlands: Agricultural University; 1989. 67 p.
  19. Старостина ЕГ, Шаврикова ЕП. Разработка опросника «Соблюдение принципов рационального питания» для больных сахарным диабетом 2-го типа и оценка возможности его применения. Альманах клинической медицины. 2016;44(4):422–9. doi: 10.18786/2072-0505-2016-44-4-422-429.
  20. Лурия РА. Внутренняя картина болезни и ятрогенные заболевания. 4-е изд. М.: Медицина; 1977. 111 c.

Supplementary files

There are no supplementary files to display.


Copyright (c) 2019 Starostina E.G.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies