Fusion of computed tomography and diffusionweighted magnetic resonance images for detection of primary, residual and recurrent cholesteatoma of the middle ear

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background:  At present,  computed  tomography  (CT)  is recognized  as  method for primary diagnosis of middle ear disorders. More accurate diagnosis  of  cholesteatoma  is based  on  a  sequence  of non-echo   planar  diffusion-weighted magnetic  resonance imaging. The choice of the type  of surgery depends on cholesteatoma size and location. Aim: To assess the possibility of fusion of CT and magnetic  resonance images (MRI) to determine the  precise location of the  middle ear cholesteatoma. Materials and methods: The CT and diffusion-weighted (DW) images of 24 patients  with chronic suppurative otitis media, including 12 with newly diagnosed and 12 with relapsing cholesteatoma were fused. The patients underwent the  standard  CT and  MRI, including DW-MRI.  CT  and  DW-MRI  images  were  fused with determination of exact size and location of cholesteatoma in the middle ear cavity. Results: The exact location and size of the cholesteatoma were identified. The study results were compared with intraoperative data. The use of fused CT and DW images  had  the  sensitivity in determination of cholesteatoma location and size of 96%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, and negative  of 96%, which all were higher than the corresponding values for CT and MRI assessments. Conclusion: Fusion of CT and DW-MRI allows for determination of the precise localization of cholesteatoma, partial exclusion of false-positive  results   correlate   and   for  comparison   of the  lesion with important bone  landmarks. The method may be  useful for the  surgeon  both  in planning of primary surgery, as well as for repeated revision of the postoperative cavity.

About the authors

E. A. Stepanova

Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute (MONIKI), Moscow

Author for correspondence.
Email: stepanova-moniki@mail.ru

Stepanova Elena A. – MD, PhD, Roentgenologist, Department of X-ray Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

61/2–9 Shchepkina ul., Moscow, 129110, Russian Federation. Tel.: +7 (495) 631 74 63. E-mail: stepanova-moniki@mail.ru

Russian Federation

M. V. Vishnyakova

Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute (MONIKI), Moscow

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Vishnyakova Mariya V. – MD, PhD, Head of Department of Roentgenology

Russian Federation

A. S. Abramenko

Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute (MONIKI), Moscow

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Abramenko Aleksandr S. – MD, Junior Research Fellow, Department of Roentgenology

Russian Federation

V. I. Sambulov

Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute (MONIKI), Moscow

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Sambulov Vyacheslav I. – MD, PhD, Leading Research Fellow, Department of Otorhinolaryngology

Russian Federation

References

  1. Wahl RL, Towsend DW, Meltzer CC, Von Schulthess GK, Fishman EK. CT/PET Fusion Imaging [abstract]. Program and abstracts of the 88th Assembly and Scientific Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America; December 1–6, 2002; Chicago, Illinois. Radiology. 2002;Suppl 225:42.
  2. Siddiqui MM, Rais-Bahrami S, Turkbey B, George AK, Rothwax J, Shakir N, Okoro C, Raskolnikov D, Parnes HL, Linehan WM, Merino MJ, Simon RM, Choyke PL, Wood BJ, Pinto PA. Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. JAMA. 2015;313(4):390–7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.17942.
  3. Гаров ЕВ, Гарова ЕЕ. Современные принципы диагностики и лечения пациентов с хроническим гнойным средним отитом. Русский медицинский журнал. 2012;20(27):1355–9.
  4. Khater NH, Fahmy HS, Shahat HME, Khater AM. Chronic inflammatory middle ear disease: Postoperative CT and MRI findings. Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2015;46(3):629–38. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrnm.2015.05.005.
  5. Ilıca AT, Hıdır Y, Bulakbaşı N, Satar B, Güvenç I, Arslan HH, Imre N. HASTE diffusion-weighted MRI for the reliable detection of cholesteatoma. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2012;18(2):153–8. doi: 10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.4246-11.3.
  6. Крюков АИ, Гаров ЕВ, Зеленкова ВН, Гарова ЕЕ. Современные тенденции в санирующей хирургии хронического гнойного среднего отита с холестеатомой. В: Материалы XIV научно-практической конференции «Фармакологические и физические методы лечения в оториноларингологии». М.; 2016. c. 34–5.
  7. McJunkin J, Chole R. Clinical utility of MRI for cholesteatoma recurrence. Curr Surg Rep. 2014;2(8):63. doi: 10.1007/s40137-014-0063-0.
  8. Juliano AF, Ginat DT, Moonis G. Imaging review of the temporal bone: part I. Anatomy and inflammatory and neoplastic processes. Radiology. 2013;269(1):17–33. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13120733.
  9. Степанова ЕА, Самбулов ВИ, Вишнякова МВ. Диффузионно-взвешенная магнитно-резонансная томография в диагностике холестеатом среднего уха. Омский научный вестник. 2014;2(134):63–6.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2016 Stepanova E.A., Vishnyakova M.V., Abramenko A.S., Sambulov V.I.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies