DEVELOPMENT OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE ON COMPLIANCE TO MEDICAL NUTRITION THERAPY FOR TYPE 2 DIABETIC PATIENTS AND ASSESSMENT OF ITS POTENTIAL USE

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

Background: А  specific questionnaire is necessary to perform quantitative assessment of compliance to medical nutrition therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM).

Aim: Тo develop a questionnaire to assess how type 2 diabetic patients adhere with the principles of medical nutrition therapy and to identify factors associated with good dietary compliance.

Materials and methods: We proposed a questionnaire "Dietary adherence test" (DAT) and validated it in 300 inand out-patients with type 2 DM. DAT was validated against the diabetes-related behavior score, diabetes-related knowledge score, and HbA1c level; the internal consistency coefficient (Cronbach's alfa) was also calculated.

Results: Cronbach's alfa for primary raw and standardized data were 0.7444 and 0.7413, respectively, thus meeting the required range of 0.7–0.8. The score on DAT item 1 (the title item) and total score (the sum of scores of item 2 to 10) correlated with the diabetes-related behavior score (r=0.21, р=0.0006 and r=0.34, р<0.0001, respectively). Patients with poor dietary compliance (average DAT score≤2) had a significantly lower score on the subscale "Nutrition" of the diabetes knowledge test, than those with good dietary compliance (average DAT score≥2) (44.9±15.6 vs 60.2±16.2, р<0.0001). Patients who perceived their diet as the most burdensome element of life with diabetes, had lower total DAT score (24.1±4.6) than those who did not see their diet as a problem (25.9±5.1, р=0.001). There was a  significant difference in average DAT score between patients on insulin therapy and patients on oral treatment (2.8±0.6 vs 2.9±0.6, respectively, р=0.019). Patients with poor and good dietary adherence, according to DAT, differed in their duration of diabetes, social status and diabetes-related behavior score. There was a  weak correlation between the DAT score and duration of diabetes (r=0.16, р=0.009), and weak inverse correlation between the DAT score and total serum cholesterol levels (r=-0.16, р=0.01).

Conclusion: The diagnostic characteristics of the proposed questionnaire meet the criteria of face, content and external validity and internal consistency, or reliability. This self-report questionnaire allows to assess the type 2 DM patient's awareness and adherence to medical nutritional therapy, at no additional time expenses of the doctor. No associations between dietary adherence and main parameters of treatment efficacy in type 2 DM were found.

About the authors

E. G. Starostina

Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute (MONIKI)

Author for correspondence.
Email: elena.starostina@rambler.ru

MD, PhD, Professor, Chair of Endocrinology, Postgraduate Training Faculty,

61/2 Shchepkina ul., Moscow, 129110

Russian Federation

E. P. Shavrikova

PSI Company Ltd; Gryphon Business Centre

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Head of Department of Biostatistics,

19 Dostoevskogo ul., Saint Petersburg, 191119

Russian Federation

References

  1. Дедов ИИ, Шестакова МВ, Галстян ГР, Григорян ОР, Есаян РМ, Калашников ВЮ, Кураева ТЛ, Липатов ДВ, Майоров АЮ, Петеркова ВА, Смирнова ОМ, Старостина ЕГ, Суркова ЕВ, Сухарева ОЮ, Токмакова АЮ, Шамхалова МШ, Ярек-Мартынова ИР. Алгоритмы специализированной медицинской помощи больным сахарным диабетом. 7-й выпуск. Сахарный диабет. 2015;18(Спецвыпуск 1):1–112. doi: 10.14341/DM20151S1-112.
  2. Старостина ЕГ. Лечение сахарного диабета. В: Потемкин ВВ, ред. Эндокринология. Руководство для врачей. М.: МИА; 2013. c. 483–514.
  3. Hendrychova T, Vytrisalova M, Vlcek J, Smahelova A, Kubena AA. Ananalysis of fat-related and fiber-related behavior in men and women with type 2 diabetes mellitus: key findings for clinical practice. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013;7:877–84. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S47497.
  4. Asaad G, Sadegian M, Lau R, Xu Y, Soria-Contreras DC, Bell RC, Chan CB. The Reliability and Validity of the Perceived Dietary Adherence Questionnaire for People with Type 2 Diabetes. Nutrients. 2015;7(7):5484–96. doi: 10.3390/nu7075231.
  5. Jaacks LM, Ma Y, Davis N, Delahanty LM, Mayer-Davis EJ, Franks PW, Brown-Friday J, Isonaga M, Kriska AM, Venditti EM, Wylie-Rosett J; Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Long-term changes in dietary and food intake behaviour in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study. Diabet Med. 2014;31(12):1631–42. doi: 10.1111/dme.12500.
  6. Soria-Contreras DC, Bell RC, McCargar LJ, Chan CB. Feasibility and efficacy of menu planning combined with individual counselling to improve health outcomes and dietary adherence in people with type 2 diabetes: a pilot study. Can J Diabetes. 2014;38(5):320–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2014.03.009.
  7. Chantelau E. Das Diabetes Diät-Dilemma. Mainz: Verlag Kirchheim+Co GmbH; 2001. 208 p.
  8. Kline P. A Handbook of test construction. Introduction to psychometric design. New York: Routledge; 2015. 274 p.
  9. Berger M, Jörgens V, Flatten G. Health care for persons with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The German experience. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124(1 Pt 2):153–5.
  10. Старостина ЕГ. Биомедицинские и психосоциальные аспекты сахарного диабета и ожирения: взаимодействие врача и пациента и пути его оптимизации: автореф. дис. … д-ра мед. наук. М.; 2003.
  11. Бурлачук ЛФ. Психодиагностика. СПб.: Питер; 2002. 352 с.
  12. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. United States: Taylor Francis Ltd; 2015.
  13. Todd C, Bradley C. Evaluating the design and development of psychological scales. In: Bradley C, editor. Handbook of psychology and diabetes: aguide to psychological measurement in diabetes research and practice. Chur, Switzerland: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1994. p. 15–42.
  14. Старостина ЕГ, Володина МН, Бобров АЕ. Клинико-лабораторные корреляты уровня интеллекта (IQ) у больных сахарным диабетом 2 типа и ожирением. Альманах клинической медицины. 2015;Спецвыпуск 1:87–94.

Supplementary files

There are no supplementary files to display.


Copyright (c) 2016 Starostina E.G., Shavrikova E.P.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies