Matrix metalloproteinases 2, 7, 8, 9 and their type 1 tissue inhibitor in serum of renal cancer patients: clinical and pathologic correlations

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background: The cause of late diagnosis of renal cancer lies in its durable, almost asymptomatic course. Due to the use of antiangiogenic therapies much progress has been made in its treatment in recent years. Yet, many questions concerning the diagnosis, prognosis and prediction of the efficiency of targeted therapy remain unsolved. Therefore, exploration of new renal cancer molecular markers, especially those related to its angiogenic and invasive activities, are still on the agenda. Such markers include the family of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) that degrade the majority of extracellular matrix components and are involved at all stages of tumor progression. Aim: Comparative evaluation of MMP2, 7, 8, 9 and type 1 tissue inhibitor (TIMP-1) levels in serum of healthy individuals and patients with renal cancer or benign renal tumors, analysis of their associations with the main clinical and pathologic characteristics of the disease. Materials and methods: We examined 99  renal cancer patients (of those 94 with primary tumor and 5 at progression) and 10 patients with benign renal tumors. The control group included 97 healthy individuals. Levels of the proteins studied were measured using respective direct ELISA kits (Quantikine®, R&D Systems, USA). Results: MMP-7, MMP-8 and TIMP-1 levels in the sera of renal cancer patients were significantly higher than in the control group and in benign renal tumor patients. MMP-2 and MMP-9 levels did not differ significantly between the study and control groups. At MMP-7 cut-off level of 3.0  ng/mL, its diagnostic sensitivity for primary renal cancer was 84%, specificity in relation to “healthy” control – 87.5%, in relation to the pathologic control (healthy donors+benign renal tumor patients) – 73%. The best sensitivity: specificity ratio for TIMP-1 was 67 and 65% at the cut-off level of 315 ng/ml. No cut-off value with acceptable sensitivity: specificity ratio was found for MMP-8. Serum levels of all these 3 markers were positively associated with disease stage and TNM indices; MMP-7 and TIMP-1 levels also increased with lower differentiation grade. In 5 patients evaluated at disease progression the levels of all the markers studied were markedly higher than in the primary patients, and exceeded the estimated cut-off values. Conclusion: MMP-7 should be regarded as the most promising serological renal cancer marker; its serum levels exceed the cut-off value even in 84% stage I patients. TIMP-1 has acceptable sensitivity (70% and above) only from stage II renal cancer onwards, while MMP-8 levels are increased only at stage III–IV of the disease.

About the authors

E. S. Gershtein

N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center

Author for correspondence.
Email: esgershtein@gmail.com

Gershtein Elena S. – Doctor of Biol. Sci., Professor, Leading Researcher, Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry 

24 Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow, 115478 

Russian Federation

V. V. Mushtenko

N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Mushtenko Vladimir V. – MD, Urologist, Applicant of Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry 

24 Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow, 115478 

Russian Federation

E. A. Korotkova

N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Korotkova Ekaterina A. – PhD (in Biology), Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry 

24 Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow, 115478 

Russian Federation

S. D. Bezhanova

N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Bezhanova Svetlana D. – Postgraduate Student, Department of the Pathologic Anatomy of Human Tumors 

24 Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow, 115478 

Russian Federation

A. A. Morozov

Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute (MONIKI)

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Morozov Aleksey A. – MD, Urologist, Department of Urology 

61/2 Shchepkina ul., Moscow, 129110

Russian Federation

A. A. Alferov

N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Alferov Aleksandr A. – Postgraduate Student, Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry 

24 Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow, 115478 

Russian Federation

I. A. Kazantseva

Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute (MONIKI)

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Kazantseva Irina A. – MD, PhD, Professor, Leading Researcher, Department of Pathologic Anatomy 

61/2 Shchepkina ul., Moscow, 129110

Russian Federation

N. E. Kushlinskii

N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Kushlinskii Nikolay E. – MD, PhD, Professor, Member-Correspondent of Russian Academy of Sciences, Head of Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry 

24 Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow, 115478 

Russian Federation

References

  1. Ainsworth NL, Lee JS, Eisen T. Impact of anti-angiogenic treatments on metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2009;9(12):1793–805. doi: 10.1586/era.09.144.
  2. Srinivasan R, Armstrong AJ, Dahut W, George DJ. Anti-angiogenic therapy in renal cell cancer. BJU Int. 2007;99(5 Pt B):1296–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06834.x.
  3. Oya M. Renal cell carcinoma: biological features and rationale for molecular-targeted therapy. Keio J Med. 2009;58(1):1–11. doi: http://doi.org/10.2302/kjm.58.1.
  4. Virman JP, Bono P, Luukkaala TH, Sunela KL, Kujala PM, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL. Combined Angiogenesis and Proliferation Markers' Expressions as Long-Term Prognostic Factors in Renal Cell Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016;14(4):e283–9. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.12.014.
  5. Герштейн ЕС, Кушлинский НЕ. Клинические перспективы исследования ассоциированных с опухолью протеаз и их тканевых ингибиторов у онкологических больных. Вестник Российской академии медицинских наук. 2013;68(5):16–27.
  6. Deryugina EI, Quigley JP. Pleiotropic roles of matrix metalloproteinases in tumor angiogenesis: contrasting, overlapping and compensatory functions. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1803(1):103–20. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2009.09.017.
  7. Abdel-Wahed MM, Asaad NY, Aleskandarany M. Expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 in renal cell carcinoma. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2004;16(3):168–77.
  8. Cheng HP, Duan YR, Li Y, Li XD, Zhu CY, Chen BP. Clinicopathological significance of matrix metalloproteinase-2 protein expression in renal cell carcinoma patients. Anal Quant Cytopathol Histpathol. 2015;37(6):353–63.
  9. Cho NH, Shim HS, Rha SY, Kang SH, Hong SH, Choi YD, Hong SJ, Cho SH. Increased expression of matrix metalloproteinase 9 correlates with poor prognostic variables in renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2003;44(5):560–6. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00362-2.
  10. Lu H, Yang Z, Zhang H, Gan M, Zhou T, Wang S. The expression and clinical significance of matrix metalloproteinase 7 and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases 2 in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Exp Ther Med. 2013;5(3):890–6. doi: 10.3892/etm.2012.859.
  11. Qiao ZK, Li YL, Lu HT, Wang KL, Xu WH. Expression of tissue levels of matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases in renal cell carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol. 2013;11:1. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-11-1.
  12. DI Carlo A. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 and -2 in sera and urine of patients with renal carcinoma. Oncol Lett. 2014;7(3):621–6. doi: 10.3892/ol.2013.1755.
  13. Lein M, Jung K, Laube C, Hübner T, Winkelmann B, Stephan C, Hauptmann S, Rudolph B, Schnorr D, Loening SA. Matrix-metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in plasma and tumor tissue of patients with renal cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2000;85(6):801–4. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(20000315)85:63.0.CO;2-C.
  14. Ramankulov A, Lein M, Johannsen M, Schrader M, Miller K, Jung K. Plasma matrix metalloproteinase-7 as a metastatic marker and survival predictor in patients with renal cell carcinomas. Cancer Sci. 2008;99(6):1188–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.00802.x.
  15. Niedworok C, vom Dorp F, Tschirdewahn S, Rübben H, Reis H, Szucs M, Szarvas T. Validation of the diagnostic and prognostic relevance of serum MMP-7 levels in renal cell cancer by using a novel automated fluorescent immunoassay method. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016;48(3): 355–61. doi: 10.1007/s11255-015-1185-8.
  16. Ban CR, Twigg SM, Franjic B, Brooks BA, Celermajer D, Yue DK, McLennan SV. Serum MMP-7 is increased in diabetic renal disease and diabetic diastolic dysfunction. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;87(3):335–41. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2010.01.004.
  17. Basu RK, Donaworth E, Siroky B, Devarajan P, Wong HR. Loss of matrix metalloproteinase-8 is associated with worsened recovery after ischemic kidney injury. Ren Fail. 2015;37(3): 469–75. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2014.996842.
  18. Chang HR, Yang SF, Li ML, Lin CC, Hsieh YS, Lian JD. Relationships between circulating matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 and renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin Chim Acta. 2006;366(1–2):243–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2005.10.007.
  19. Hsiao KC, Tsai JP, Yang SF, Lee WC, Huang JY, Chang SC, Hso CS, Chang HR. MMP-2 serum concentrations predict mortality in hemodialysis patients: a 5-year cohort study. Clin Chim Acta. 2016;452:161–6. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2015.11.019.
  20. Lu LC, Yang CW, Hsieh WY, Chuang WH, Lin YC, Lin CS. Decreases in plasma MMP-2/TIMP-2 and MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratios in uremic patients during hemodialysis. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2016;20(6): 934–42. doi: 10.1007/s10157-015-1221-0.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2017 Gershtein E.S., Mushtenko V.V., Korotkova E.A., Bezhanova S.D., Morozov A.A., Alferov A.A., Kazantseva I.A., Kushlinskii N.E.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies