Temporomandibular joint's reconstruction after segmental mandibulectomy in patients with primary and secondary tumors of the mandible

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background: Auto and allografts are used for segmental resection of the mandible with its exarticulation and simultaneous reconstruction. Endoprosthetic replacement of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) may bring good functional results. However, some complications, such as fracture of the fixing part of the endoprosthesis, migration of its head into the middle cranial fossa and prosthesis eruption, can occur in the long-term. The use of revascularized bone autografts allow for replacement of the mandibular defect and to restore TMJ function. Aim: To evaluate functional, aesthetic and oncological results after segmental resection of the mandible with its exarticulation and simultaneous reconstruction with allografts and revascularized bone autografts. Materials and methods: Thirty patients were enrolled into the study, 22 of them being with primary mandibular tumors and 8 with oral cancers originating from mucosa, with advanced involvement of the mandible. Segmental mandibulectomy with simultaneous reconstruction was performed in all patients, with 9 of them having the allograft and endoprosthesis of the articular head and 21 patients having revascularized bone or combined grafts. If only a defect of the mandibular ramus and articular head was to be replaced, we used an iliac free flap (n = 5), whereas for replacement of a defect of the mandibular ramus, body and articular head a fibular free flap was implanted (n = 16). Results: The use of allografts was associated with 4 (44.4%) complication events, such as plate fracture (n = 2) at 2 and 6 years and eruption of the plate. When revascularized grafts were used, complete necrosis was seen in 1 (4.7%) case. The iliac graft was formed with the size of the ramus defect (most often, up to the mandibular angle), and the articular head was formed from the distal part. At least one osteotomy was performed in the fibular graft at the angle, and the articular head was formed in the distal part. Twenty (66.7%) patients are currently disease-free. Six (33.3%) patients died of relapse at 1 to 5 years, and 4 (13.3%) patients died with lung metastases of osteogenic sarcoma of the mandible. Conclusion: Allotransplantation after segmental resection of the mandible gives good functional results, although with a high rate of late complications (44.4%). In patients with limited defects of the mandibular ramus and head, revascularized iliac grafts can be used. In those with large defects, the method of choice is a fibular graft. It is possible to make the articular head of the distal end of the graft with its subsequent adaptation to the functional load.

About the authors

M. A. Kropotov

Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow Healthcare Department

Author for correspondence.
Email: drkropotov@mail.ru

Kropotov Mikhail A. – MD, PhD, Leading Research Fellow, Center for Head and Neck Oncology 

86 Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123

Russian Federation

V. A. Sobolevskiy

N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Sobolevskiy Vladimir A. – MD, PhD, Head of Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 

24 Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow, 115478

Russian Federation

Yu. Yu. Dikov

N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Dikov Yuriy Yu. – MD, PhD, Research Fellow, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 

24 Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow, 115478

Russian Federation

L. P. Yakovleva

Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow Healthcare Department

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Yakovleva Liliya P. – MD, PhD, Head of Center for Head and Neck Oncology 

86 Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123

Russian Federation

A. A. Lysov

N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Lysov Andrey A. – MD, Surgeon, Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery 

24 Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow, 115478

Russian Federation

References

  1. Пачес АИ. Опухоли головы и шеи. М.: Медицина; 2001. 479 с.
  2. Белоусов АЕ. Пластическая, реконструктивная и эстетическая хирургия. СПб.: Гиппократ; 1998. 744 с.
  3. Пейпл АД, ред. Пластическая и реконструктивная хирургия лица. М.: БИНОМ. Лаборатория знаний; 2013. 1136 с.
  4. Вавилов ВН, Калакуцкий НВ, Ушаков BC. Непосредственные результаты замещения обширных изъянов на голове и шее трансплантатами с осевым кровоснабжением. В: Проблемы микрохирургии. Тезисы V симпозиума по пластической и реконструктивной хирургии. 15–16 ноября 1994 г., Москва. М.; 1994. с. 31–2.
  5. Матякин ЕГ. Реконструктивная пластическая хирургия при опухолях головы и шеи. В: Опухоли головы и шеи: Европейская школа онкологов. М.; 1993.
  6. Кропотов МА. Органосохраняющие и реконструктивные операции на нижней челюсти в комбинированном лечении рака слизистой оболочки полости рта. Автореферат дис. … д-ра мед. наук. М.; 2004.
  7. Соболевский ВА. Реконструктивная хирургия в лечении больных с местно-распространенными опухолями костей, кожи и мягких тканей. Автореферат дис. … д-ра мед. наук. М.; 2008.
  8. Неробеев АИ, Вербо ЕВ, Караян АС, Дробат ГВ. Замещение дефектов нижней зоны лица после удаления новообразований нижней челюсти. Анналы пластической, реконструктивной и эстетической хирургии. 1997;(3): 24–31.
  9. Bak M, Jacobson AS, Buchbinder D, Urken ML. Contemporary reconstruction of the mandible. Oral Oncol. 2010;46(2): 71–6. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.11.006.
  10. Rana M, Warraich R, Kokemuller H, Lemound J, Essig H, Tavassol F, Eckardt A, Gellrich NC. Reconstruction of mandibular defects – clinical retrospective research over a 10-year period. Head Neck Oncol. 2011;3:23. doi: 10.1186/1758-3284-3-23.
  11. Wei FC, Chen HC, Chuang CC, Noordhoff MS. Fibular osteoseptocutaneous flap: anatomic study and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;78(2): 191–200.
  12. Yoshimura H, Ohba S, Yasuta M, Nakai K, Fujieda S, Sano K. Infrazygomatico-coronoid fixation in a segmental mandibular reconstruction with a free vascularized flap: A simple and correct repositioning method without interfering with reconstructive and microsurgical procedures. Head Neck. 2016;38(1): 1679–87. doi: 10.1002/hed.24506.
  13. Ritschl LM, Mucke T, Fichter A, Gull FD, Schmid C, Duc JMP, Kesting MR, Wolff KD, Loeffelbein DJ. Functional outcome of CAD/ CAM-assisted versus conventional microvascular, fibular free flap reconstruction of the mandible: a retrospective study of 30 cases. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2017;33(4): 281–91. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1597823.
  14. Sawh-Martinez R, Parsaei Y, Wu R, Lin A, Metzler P, DeSesa C, Steinbacher DM. Improved temporomandibular joint position after 3-dimensional planned mandibular reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;75(1): 197– 206. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.07.032.
  15. Tarsitano A, Battaglia S, Ramieri V, Cascone P, Ciocca L, Scotti R, Marchetti C. Shortterm outcomes of mandibular reconstruction in oncological patients using a CAD/CAM prosthesis including a condyle supporting a fibular free flap. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017;45(2): 330–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.12.006.
  16. Head C, Alam D, Sercarz JA, Lee JT, Rawnsley JD, Berke GS, Blackwell KE. Microvascular flap reconstruction of the mandible: a comparison of bone grafts and bridging plates for restoration of mandibular continuity. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129(1): 48–54. doi: 10.1016/S0194-59980300480-7.
  17. Матякин ЕГ, ред. Реконструктивные операции при опухолях головы и шеи. М.: Вердана; 2009. 224 c.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2017 Kropotov M.A., Sobolevskiy V.A., Dikov Y.Y., Yakovleva L.P., Lysov A.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies