ELISA study of matrix metalloproteinases 2, 7, 9 and their type 2 tissue inhibitor in the tumors of gastric cancer patients: clinical and pathologic correlations

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background: Over the last 10 years the incidence of gastric cancer has declined significantly. Nevertheless, it remains one of the most prevalent malignancies both in Russia and worldwide. Therefore, the problems of early diagnostics, prognosis and individualized treatment choice are still on the agenda. Much attention is paid to the evaluation of molecular biological characteristics of the tumor, as well as to the development of multiparametric prognostic systems for gastric cancer based on its identified characteristics. An important place among potential tumor biological markers belongs to matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) involved into all the stages of tumor progression, first of all, into the regulation of invasion and metastasizing.

Aim: Comparative quantitative evaluation of some MMP family members (MMP-2, 7, and 9) and one of the tissue MMP inhibitors (TIMP-2) levels in the tumors and adjacent histologically unchanged mucosa in gastric cancer patients, the analysis of their associations with the main clinical and pathological features of the disease and its prognosis.

Materials and methods: Sixty six (66) primary gastric cancer patients (32 male and 34 female) aged 24 to 82 years (median, 61 year) were recruited into the study. Twenty two (22) patients were with stage I of the disease, 11 with stage II, 28 with stage III, and 5 with stage IV. The concentrations of the proteins studied were measured in the tumor and unchanged mucosa extracts by standard direct ELISA kits (Quantikine®, R&D Systems, USA).

Results: Tumor MMP-2, 7 and 9 levels were significantly increased, compared to those in the adjacent histologically unchanged mucosa, in 80, 70 and 72% of gastric cancer patients, respectively, while the increase of TIMP-2 level found in 61% of the tumors was not statistically significant. Tumor MMP-2 and TIMP-2 content was increasing significantly with higher T index – size and advancement of the primary tumor (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05 respectively). Tumor MMP-2 level was also increasing in parallel with the N index (regional lymph node involvement; p < 0.01); it was significantly higher in the patients with distant metastases than in those without them (p < 0.05). Tumor MMP-9 and MMP-7 concentrations were not significantly associated with the indices of the tumor progression. The patients were followed up for 1 to 85 months (median, 18.3 months). According to the univariate analysis, high (> 32.6 ng/mg protein) MMP-2 and low MMP-7 (< 1.1 ng/mg protein) levels in the gastric cancer tissue represent statistically significant unfavorable prognostic factors for overall survival. Increased TIMP-2 level is associated with a non-significant decrease in the overall survival (p > 0.05), whereas the MMP-9 level was unrelated to the gastric cancer prognosis. Only T index (p = 0.0034) and tumor MMP-7 content (p = 0.026) remained independent prognostic factors in the multivariate regression analysis.

Conclusion: The majority of gastric cancer patients demonstrate a significant increase in the expression of three MMP family members, i.e. gelatinases (MMP-2 and 9), and matrilysin (MMP-7), in the tumors, as compared to adjacent histologically unchanged mucosa. Only MMP-2 levels were associated with the disease progression, increasing with higher TNM system indices. High MMP-2 and low MMP-7 content in the gastric cancer tissue are significant unfavorable prognostic factors for the overall survival in the univariate analysis, but only MMP-7 has retained its independent prognostic value in the multivariate assessment.

About the authors

E. S. Gershtein

N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Centre of Oncology

Author for correspondence.
Email: biochimia@yandex.ru

Elena S. Gershtein – ScD in Biology, Professor, Leading Research Fellow, Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry 

24 Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow, 115478

Russian Federation

A. A. Ivannikov

Tambov State University named after G.R. Derzhavin

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Andrey A. Ivannikov – Surgical Oncologist, Assistant of the Chair of Anatomy, Operative Surgery and Oncology 

33 Internatsional'naya ul., Tambov, 392000

Russian Federation

V. L. Chang

Tambov State University named after G.R. Derzhavin

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Victor L. Chang – Assistant of the Chair of Anatomy, Operative Surgery and Oncology 

33 Internatsional'naya ul., Tambov, 392000

Russian Federation

N. A. Ognerubov

Tambov State University named after G.R. Derzhavin

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Nikolay A. Ognerubov – MD, PhD, Professor, Head of the Chair of Anatomy, Operative Surgery and Oncology 

33 Internatsional'naya ul., Tambov, 392000

Russian Federation

М. M. Davydov

N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Centre of Oncology

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Mikhail M. Davydov – MD, PhD, Member-Correspondent of Russian Academy of Sciences, Head of the Department of Thoracic Oncology

 24 Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow, 115478

Russian Federation

I. S. Stilidi

N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Centre of Oncology

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Ivan S. Stilidi – MD, PhD, Professor, Member-Correspondent of Russian Academy of Sciences, Head of the Surgical Department of Abdominal Oncology, Director

 24 Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow, 115478

Russian Federation

N. E. Kushlinskii

N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Centre of Oncology

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Nikolay E. Kushlinskii – MD, PhD, Professor, Member-Correspondent of Russian Academy of Sciences, Head of Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry 

24 Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow, 115478

Russian Federation

References

  1. Wu W, Yong WW, Chung MC. A simple biomarker scoring matrix for early gastric cancer detection. Proteomics. 2016;16(22): 2921–30. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201600194.
  2. Герштейн ЕС, Кушлинский НЕ. Клинические перспективы исследования ассоциированных с опухолью протеаз и их тканевых ингибиторов у онкологических больных. Вестник Российской академии медицинских наук. 2013;68(5): 16–27. doi: 10.15690/vramn.v68i5.659.
  3. Deryugina EI, Quigley JP. Pleiotropic roles of matrix metalloproteinases in tumor angiogenesis: contrasting, overlapping and compensatory functions. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1803(1): 103–20. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2009.09.017.
  4. Ramnath N, Creaven PJ. Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors. Curr Oncol Rep. 2004;6(2): 96–102. doi: 10.1007/s11912-004-0020-7.
  5. Sounni NE, Janssen M, Foidart JM, Noel A. Membrane type-1 matrix metalloproteinase and TIMP-2 in tumor angiogenesis. Matrix Biol. 2003;22(1): 55–61. doi: 10.1016/S0945053X(03)00003-9.
  6. Westermarck J, Kahari VM. Regulation of matrix metalloproteinase expression in tumor invasion. FASEB J. 1999;13(8): 781–92. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.13.8.781.
  7. Chen J, Chen LJ, Zhou HC, Yang RB, Lu Y, Xia YL, Wu W, Hu LW. Prognostic value of matrix metalloproteinase9 in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2014;61(130): 518–24.
  8. Sampieri CL, Leon-Cordoba K, Remes-Troche JM. Matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors in gastric cancer as molecular markers. J Cancer Res Ther. 2013;9(3): 356–63. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.119302.
  9. Shen W, Xi H, Wei B, Chen L. The prognostic role of matrix metalloproteinase 2 in gastric cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2014;140(6): 1003–9. doi: 10.1007/s00432-014-1630-6.
  10. Soleyman-Jahi S, Nedjat S, Abdirad A, Hoorshad N, Heidari R, Zendehdel K. Prognostic significance of matrix metalloproteinase-7 in gastric cancer survival: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0122316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122316.
  11. Zhang QW, Liu L, Chen R, Wei YQ, Li P, Shi HS, Zhao YW. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 as a prognostic factor in gastric cancer: a metaanalysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(6): 2903–8. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.6.2903.
  12. Герштейн ЕС, Короткова ЕА, Щербаков АМ, Пророков ВВ, Головков ДА, Кушлинский НЕ. Матриксные металлопротеиназы 7 и 9 и их тканевые ингибиторы 1 и 4 типа в опухолях и плазме крови больных раком толстой кишки. Бюллетень экспериментальной биологии и медицины. 2007;143(4): 438–41.
  13. Kubben FJ, Sier CF, van Duijn W, Griffioen G, Hanemaaijer R, van de Velde CJ, van Krieken JH, Lamers CB, Verspaget HW. Matrix metalloproteinase2 is a consistent prognostic factor in gastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006;94(7): 1035–40. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603041.
  14. Mrena J, Wiksten JP, Nordling S, Kokkola A, Ristimaki A, Haglund C. MMP-2 but not MMP-9 associated with COX-2 and survival in gastric cancer. J Clin Pathol. 2006;59(6): 618–23. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2005.033761.
  15. de Mingo M, Moran A, Sanchez-Pernaute A, Iniesta P, Diez-Valladares L, Perez-Aguirre E, de Juan C, Garcia-Aranda C, Diaz-Lopez A, Garcia-Botella A, Martin-Antona E, Benito M, Torres A, Balibrea JL. Expression of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 as prognostic markers in gastric carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007;54(73): 315–9.
  16. Kubben FJ, Sier CF, Hawinkels LJ, Tschesche H, van Duijn W, Zuidwijk K, van der Reijden JJ, Hanemaaijer R, Griffioen G, Lamers CB, Verspaget HW. Clinical evidence for a protective role of lipocalin-2 against MMP-9 autodegradation and the impact for gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43(12): 1869–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.05.013.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2018 Gershtein E.S., Ivannikov A.A., Chang V.L., Ognerubov N.A., Davydov М.M., Stilidi I.S., Kushlinskii N.E.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies